A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Grover, Neel Kanth
- RMS Cell Formation using Block Diagonalized Matrix
Authors
1 IKG PTU, Kapurthala – 144603,, Punjab, IN
2 S B S State Technical Campus, Ferozepur – 152004, Punjab, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 10, No 16 (2017), Pagination:Abstract
Objectives: To develop a methodology for cell formation (i.e. recognition of part families and corresponding operation groups) for a Reconfigurable Manufacturing System (RMS) using a block diagonalized matrix. Method: Like Cellular Manufacturing System (CMS), the foundation of RMS lies on the premise of group technology. The present work highlights the peculiarities of RMS Vis a Vis CMS. CMS cell formation problem has a vast literature available. The present work intends to evolve a methodology for RMS cell formation relies on adapting suitably a CMS cell formation methodology with RMS peculiarities in focus. The method consists of two steps, first the matrix representing part-operation data is diagonalized and then the adapted cell formation methodology is applied on this diagonalized matrix to form the RMS cells. Findings: The effectiveness of the proposed methodology has been compared with some standard problems from the CMS literature and reported to work satisfactorily. Novelty/Improvement: The present work provides an initial framework for the RMS design which is a promising Manufacturing System paradigm for future. General Terms: Cell Formation, Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems.Keywords
Cell Formation, Group Technology, Operation Group, Part Family, RMS.- Learnings & Selection Guidelines of Mechanical Seal Flush Plan for Pumps in a Typical Plant
Authors
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, I. K. Gujral Punjab Technical University, Punjab, IN
2 P.U. Swami Sarvanand Giri Regional Centre, Punjab, IN
Source
Manufacturing Technology Today, Vol 19, No 3-4 (2020), Pagination: 35-45Abstract
Pump mechanical seal failure incidents out number any other rotating component of a pump in a typical OG & C Plant. This is also well-known fact that up to 70% of pump maintenance expenditure is responsible for seal repair/maintenance or replacements. This arises the need for accurate selection of mechanical seal for given pump & particular service conditions. As
a standard industry practice, Pump Buyer usually follows Pump/Seal Vendor recommendation for final selection of Seal Plan. Although the onus of deciding the seal plan and material selection is fairly & squarely on the Pump/Seal Vendor, however it is recommended that Buyer shall also validate/verify the seal selection during bid evaluation stage himself (based on seal selection guidelines). This will help in avoiding changes in seal plan during detailed engineering (after award) which otherwise led to cost/schedule impact. Before selecting the seal material, type of seal the designer or pump manufacturer either needs to go through exhaustively complete scope of API 682 and their field experience (operational experience of using Seal Type X in Pump Type Y with process parameters Z).
This paper will illustrate the selection guidelines based on seal vendor recommendations, feedback from Plant Owner (Plant O&M personals) and in-house lesson learnt. This paper will also discuss the work process diagram for the mechanical seal selection/coordination for OG&C plant along with brief information on various Seal types for Pumps per API 682.
The recommendations in this paper are based on the “typical cases” of a seal for centrifugal pumps. Other types of machine, installation conditions, modes of operation, designer’s, manufacturer’s andoperator’s specifications, local regulations and so on can result in a different choice of mechanical seal. For complex sealing duties it is always advisable for the user to consult with the specialist engineer/Operator/Consultant/Seal Manufacturer.
A sealing system for hydrocarbons must often make allowance for partial dry running due to their low boiling points. However, with the right design features and face materials, it is possible to guarantee fail safe operation of the mechanical seal.
There is no doubt that the marginally higher cost for the better-quality seals will probably be recovered during the first year of operation of pumps itself. Although this seal selection guideline is applicable for new installations /Procurement of Pumps, however this may be extended for upgrading seals of Pumps in existing OG&C installations where frequent maintenance is encountered.
Keywords
Mechanical Seal, Seal Flush Plan, Selection Guideline, Pump/Seal Vendor, OG & C Plant, Work Process Diagram, Plant Owner, API 682.References
- Ingram, J.H. (1981). Pump Reliability - Where Do You Start? In Research Report Series - University of Queensland, Department of Civil Engineering. 219–233. ASME.
- Bloch, H.P. (1978), User’s view of Fluid Sealing Economics. Paper presented at 45thAnnual Meeting of Fluid Sealing Association, Sun Valley.
- ANSI/API Standard 682. 4th Edition- Pumps- Shaft Sealing Systems for Centrifugal & Rotary Pumps.
- Day, M.W. (1995). Hydrodynamic sealing of centrifugal pumps - keys to success. World Pumps, 340, 39–41.
- Michael, H. (2005). Material selection for mechanical seals. Proceedings of the TwentySecond International Pump Users Symposium, 127–135. Flowserve Corporation, Deer Park.
- Massaro, A. J. (1988, May 5). Mating Pairs concept for mechanical face seals. Lubrication Engineering (STLE), 44, 436–446.
- Bloch, H.P. (1984). Selection strategy for mechanical shaft seals in petrochemical plants. Exxon Chemical Company. Baytown.
- Eagle Burgmann. Mechanical Seal Technology and Selection. Eagleburgmann.com.